electric universe – has modern science gone totally awry? (part 2)

Posted on February 25, 2009
Filed Under Видео | 10 Comments

junior00bacon00chee asked:


CERN and funding:

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/U.S.+funding+boosts+accelerator+project.-a020112903
http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/About/Global-en.html
http://www.scitech.ac.uk/SciProg/PP/Projects/LHC.aspx

“Scientists from some 580 institutes and universities around the world use CERNs facilities. Physicists and their funding agencies from both Member and non-Member States are responsible for the financing, construction and operation of the experiments on which they collaborate.” – CERN website

Holoscience on LHC:

http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=gzhqr188

GREAT VIDS ON ELECTRIC UNIVERSE:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V026kSw4XCs (part 1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_Bh-GemFRo (part 2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxGT9CQVkDk (part 3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uf8-CZAWsI (part 4)

REDSHIFT AND THE BIG BANG:

http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=a57ya4dj

  • No Related Post

Comments

10 Responses to “electric universe – has modern science gone totally awry? (part 2)”

  1. ProductionsGuy on February 26th, 2009 7:25 pm

    This is a really crazy theory to think about…

  2. junior00bacon00chee on March 1st, 2009 11:54 am

    true, but stealing is still stealing. i personally have no interest in funding cern.

  3. fpaiva13 on March 4th, 2009 9:05 am

    cool vids.When i have time ill look into electric physics so that i can discuss it.Sounds interesting.Any way, “if you want truth go to philosophy, if you want facts come to phscs” – phsc is not an absolute truth and our present theories will be over taken.But that doesn’t mean their wrong. its just that they have limitations..about CERN, money came from the EU countries not from US(almost sure). i prefer to see my tax money in CERN rather than having it invested in producing and sponsoring wars

  4. junior00bacon00chee on March 7th, 2009 7:43 am

    im all for helping the environment as long as it doesnt involve the govt, ie, as long as it doesnt involve threats of violence and theft.

  5. AZZAAEL on March 9th, 2009 11:13 pm

    for me the issue of global warming is a moot when the real issue is global pollution and the toxification of our environment. global warming is a distraction and we as a society should focus on more important things like reclamation of our waste, inventing cleaner energy and water conservation with the idea that rivers, lakes and ocens are not dumping grounds to public and industrial wastes.

    DO NOT GET LOST IN THE SOUND BYTES!

  6. lukeev on March 13th, 2009 1:06 am

    USE NOTES!!! :P

    But yeah Al Gore is full of crap…

    Great video.
    8D

  7. FarFromEquilibrium on March 13th, 2009 6:45 pm

    Im not getting how science is off the mark b/c its accepted. QED is not a complete theory but it makes predictions out to 13 decimals, thats pretty close to the mark and our colliders have found things that were predicted prior, which of course is the mark of a good theory. Id much rather pay for accelerators than public schools, lol. The electric universe model? I wont say anything until I see what that is. GW models are not accounting for many variables, so they are not greatly predictive.

  8. samuelmichaud on March 15th, 2009 11:33 am

    Interesting. Viva la net neutrality.

  9. Gettinghitonattheban on March 17th, 2009 3:40 am

    I bet most of the of the money goes to the scientists’ beard, so that they have something to stroke while they come up with absurd theories.

  10. soupdragon42 on March 20th, 2009 2:01 pm

    Good work. You have obviously done your research. This video is intelligent and insightful. Keep asking questions. Soupdragon42

Leave a Reply